Re: [boost] [Signals] Re: [Report] 79 regressions on RC_1_34_0 (2007-03-22)

From: Douglas Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-23 18:31:38

On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 17:02 -0500, Zach Laine wrote:
> Good point.  I tried to modify the test so that it throws in
> short_lived_2::f() instead, but that seems to work fine.  I tried a
> standalone test program with 1.33.1, HEAD, and RC_1_34_0_freeze, and
> only 1.33.1 seems to show the problem I was trying to demonstrate.

That's a *big* relief.

  Cheers,
  Doug