|
Boost :
|
- Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
- Previous message: Johan Nilsson: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
- In reply to: Howard Hinnant: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
- Next in thread: Howard Hinnant: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
- Reply: Howard Hinnant: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
Howard Hinnant wrote:
> Do we want such sharing *implicitly*? By default? In the
> *foundation* class?
There is a difference between not wanting sharing implicitly by default and
actively not supporting it by making all operations non-const and not thread
safe.
- Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
- Previous message: Johan Nilsson: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
- In reply to: Howard Hinnant: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
- Next in thread: Howard Hinnant: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
- Reply: Howard Hinnant: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk