Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al

From: Howard Hinnant (hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-26 16:12:57

On Mar 26, 2007, at 3:59 PM, Peter Dimov wrote:

> ... accepting the inevitable downside that the pthread people would  
> label it
> Windows with some pthreads mixed in, while the Windows people would  
> label it
> pthreads with some Windows mixed in.

Sorry, my bad.  I was trying to characterize, not slander.  And you're  
right, N2178 is what it is.  My labeling was heavily waited towards  
the sole/shared ownership issue (which I consider the most fundamental  
decision).

-Howard