From: Roland Schwarz (roland.schwarz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-26 16:43:57
Peter Dimov wrote:
> (Internally there is a flag being set, of course.)
Isn't this simply an implementation detail?
What I think cancel is: instruct the thread to take a
different route. (In our case one that ends it.)
Possibly seeing a thread as an object is not the
very best model. A thread when viewed in this manner
never can be const. It's instruction pointer usually
continuously is changing.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk