|
Boost : |
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-27 12:00:31
Howard Hinnant wrote:
> I believe one of the big differences is : How soon after join() can the
> thread clean up resources? I.e. the model I've been working on has an
> implicit detach() inside of join(), for the purpose of cleaning up the
> resources immediately instead of waiting to ~thread() for resource
> cleanup.
One question that comes to mind here - which I've been unable to effectively
communicate in my other post - is:
What use case exists for not destroying the thread object after it's been
detached (or joined+detached) under the current N2184 semantics?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk