From: Howard Hinnant (hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-27 12:44:14
On Mar 27, 2007, at 12:35 PM, Peter Dimov wrote:
> Once there, we may (or may not) opt to actually make the thread object
> useful after detach because this pattern currently has no other
> uses. This
> leads us directly to the 'detach suppresses cancel but has no other
> model, where you can still query the id of the detached thread,
> among other
> things, if you hold onto the object for a while.
What would join() do after detach() in this model?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk