
Boost : 
From: Lewis Hyatt (lhyatt_at_[hidden])
Date: 20070329 18:35:43
Eric Lemings wrote:
>> quantity<SI::length> l1(2.0 * SI::meters);
>> quantity<SI::length> l2(2.0 * Astro::parsecs); //for illustration only
>
> I would express that differently:
>
> quantity<SI::length> l1 (quantity<SI::meter>(2.0));
> quantity<SI::length> l2 (quantity<Astro::parsecs>(2.0)); //for
> illustration only
>
> And I could be way off base here but the latter form would appear more
> familiar/acceptable to most C++ programmers.
I think it is perfectly natural to think of units as having their own
algebra, and so the multiplication notation makes sense. How would you
do something like this:
quantity<velocity> v(2.0 * meters/second);
in your method? I think you'll find that this one is preferable.
Lewis
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk