Boost logo

Boost :

From: Steven Watanabe (steven_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-03 13:28:09


Richard Smith <richard <at>> writes:

> I've just found what I believe to be a new regression on the
> boost RC_1_34_0 branch relative to the 1.33.1 release. The
> example below is a simplified extract of some real world
> where the behaviour of boost::none silently changes.
> <snip>

Doesn't internal linkage in headers have the same
problem as unnamed namespaces? Is there some reason
we can't use

namespace boost {
namespace detail { struct none_helper {}; };
typedef int (*none_t)(none_helper);
inline int none(none_helper) {}

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at