Re: [boost] [Report] 1 regressions on RC_1_34_0 (2007-04-01)

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-03 16:40:07

on Mon Apr 02 2007, larsbj-AT-gullik.net (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) wrote:

> David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
> | on Mon Apr 02 2007, larsbj-AT-gullik.net (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) wrote:
> | 
> | > Douglas Gregor <dgregor_at_[hidden]> writes:
> | >
> | > | Boost Regression test failures
> | > | Report time: 2007-04-01T02:22:36Z
> | > | 
> | > | This report lists all regression test failures on release platforms.
> | > | 
> | > | Detailed report:
> | > |   http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/issues.html
> | > | 
> | > | 1 failures in 1 libraries
> | > |   parameter (1)
> | >
> | > I already mentioned this "warning" error in another mail, 
> | 
> | There's no such thing as a warning error; that's just a warning.
>
> By not fixing warnings in the public api you are forcing users to
> allow warnings.

I know; it's suboptimal.

> | I have a bunch of warning fixes that I've been sitting on under the
> | assumption that it's too late to make such trivial changes to code.
>
> I see other warnings as well, but those comes from libs/xxx/src.
> Quite a different animal.

I see.

> | > but no response yet.
> | 
> | If you want a response to a serialization library patch, put
> | [serialization] in the subject line.  You should also put it in the SF
> | patch tracker and assign it to the library's author.
>
> Right... did that... no response.

If it's in the tracker it will get dealt with eventually, but he's
probably not too active now because everyone is holding their breath
waiting for 1.34 to go out.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
Don't Miss BoostCon 2007! ==> http://www.boostcon.com