From: gchen (chengang31_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-04 01:12:31
Jeff Garland wrote:
>> Its just not good practice and I suspect a non-empty subset of new
>> boost users are also new to C++.
> 5 years ago I believed it was a serious issue too -- I've substantially
> changed my mind.
Oh yeah, same here.
Although I don't have any problem using libraries which require
building, I really like using these header-only libraries in boost.
Regarding new user, don't forget when we test/try some new libraries,
we are all new users. Even when we write some write-test-throw
experiment code, it is a great convenience with a header-only
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk