From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-04 05:28:31
Andrey Semashev wrote:
> Hello Tobias,
> Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 9:02:45 PM, you wrote:
>> in_place_factory can be quite useful, as I found out recently. However,
>> here are some suggestions to make it event better:
>> 1. add a construction mechanism for arrays
>> 2. add a note to the docs about deduction and using boost::ref
>> 3. have the static 'apply' member function return the pointer to the
>> constructed object - just like the placement new operator
>> 4. use file iteration instead of BOOST_PP_REPEAT for maintainability
> If I may, I'd like to add:
> 5. add in_place_factory and typed_in_place_factory for zero
> constructor arguments.
Often the reason against nullary function overloads is the earlier point
of instantiation (nullary functions can't be templates), but that
shouldn't be the problem here because 'in_place_factory's nested 'apply'
is a template and 'typed_in_place_factory' is complete enough to be
instantiated. For the 'inline in_place_factory0 in_place()' function the
explicit 'inline' keyword is needed, however, not to break the ODR.
OK. It seems reasonable and it seems there are no unsolvable problems
around, so let's add it ;-).
> I remember someone mentioned this before, but I
> can't remember any one answered.
That probably means that there's no maintainer. If that's so, I'd pick
up this role.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk