From: Andrey Semashev (andysem_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-04 15:25:20
Wednesday, April 4, 2007, 11:06:06 PM, you wrote:
>> The author of Pantheios (http://pantheios.sourceforge.net) seems to
>> think he really does know what it is, and has found the "sweet spot."
>> I have no opinion about whether he's right or not, but it would be a
>> good idea for someone who's familiar with the recent Boost discussion
>> to review his work before proceeding too much further.
> Thanks David for your advice.
> So here is some stuff I read from the documentation (.chm):
> I am not an expert in design and in no position in rejecting any library
> or whatever, and I have actually not even look into the code but IMO,
> just as reading few pages of the doc, I think pantheios is not what we
> are looking for. I would love to be wrong and that someone says,
> "pantheios is what we were looking for all those years, let put it into
> boost". I doubt it...
IMHO, we're not talking about including it into boost, but we're
looking for a proper design solutions and frequently requested useful
features, aren't we?
-- Best regards, Andrey mailto:andysem_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk