From: Richard Smith (richard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-05 06:38:57
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> For avoidance of doubt -- Richard, do you have commit
> If no, we have two question -- which solution to apply
> (Richard, can you indicate that) and who gets to check it
I took Thomas' email to mean the decision was Fernando's,
and it would be him (Fernando) who would commit.
I don't have strong opinions on whether we revert or apply
my patch. Reverting will definitely break precompiled
headers involving <boost/none.hpp> on VC7.1 and Borland; my
patch contains Steven Watanabe's attempt to solve this
(which I haven't been able to verify as I don't have access
to either affected platform, though it compiles and passes
its tests on other systems), and includes a test case for
the original regression, but it could introduce a regression
on some other platforms.
If Fernando thinks it's safest to simply revert, that's
absolutely fine by me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk