From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-05 09:54:33
On Apr 4, 2007, at 6:40 PM, Rene Rivera wrote:
> Eric Niebler wrote:
>> Moving to boost-docs ...
>> Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
>>> PS: Is this Doxygen->Boostbook conversion experimental? Support for
>>> several things seem to be missing...
>> It sure seems experimental, doesn't it? The biggest thing missing is
>> someone who is skilled at XSLT and has the motivation to fix the bugs
>> and add the missing features.
> FYI... The Dox->BoostBook translator I've been working on is finished,
> as far as duplicating all the functionality (and adding some) as the
> XSLT translator. The key feature is that it's written in Python, so
> people should be able to modify it :-)
Wonderful. Anything that simplifies that toolchain is a good idea.
Why oh why did I choose to do everything in XSLT? It seemed like a
heck of a lot of fun at the time...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk