Re: [boost] [boostbook] Duplicates and free functions

From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-05 09:54:33

On Apr 4, 2007, at 6:40 PM, Rene Rivera wrote:

> Eric Niebler wrote:
>> Moving to boost-docs ...
>>
>> Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
>
>>> PS: Is this Doxygen->Boostbook conversion experimental?  Support for
>>> several things seem to be missing...
>>
>>
>> It sure seems experimental, doesn't it? The biggest thing missing is
>> someone who is skilled at XSLT and has the motivation to fix the bugs
>> and add the missing features.
>
> FYI... The Dox->BoostBook translator I've been working on is finished,
> as far as duplicating all the functionality (and adding some) as the
> XSLT translator. The key feature is that it's written in Python, so  
> more
> people should be able to modify it :-)

Wonderful. Anything that simplifies that toolchain is a good idea.

Why oh why did I choose to do everything in XSLT? It seemed like a  
heck of a lot of fun at the time...

        Cheers,
        Doug