Re: [boost] units review

From: Matthias Schabel (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-05 12:52:08

>> I'm actually thinking of including measurement<> with the library
>> itself as a way to provide both physical constants and their
>> associated measurement errors (from CODATA, in particular)
>
> I'm not sure that I'm really keen on this.  measurement
> really doesn't belong in this library.

How about just a wrapper that provides value() and error() accessors  
and auto conversion to value_type, but no algebra or other  
functionality?

Matthias