From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-11 10:26:34
When I use macros such as
"update evidence = " <<
withEvidenceUpdate << ", evidence = " << *evidence );
it annoys me that the second argument is evaluated even when the test
In the case above, evidence is an optional<int>. It would be cool if the
construction of the error messsage could be delayed until it was
actually needed, to make the above scenario valid.
Do you think that is possible?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk