From: Christian Henning (chhenning_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-14 12:23:40
As far as I understand extensions to gil will be stand-alone. Which I
think it's a good thing. Of course, there will be an extension
dictionary and for some a addition to boost might be imaginable. But
gil as itself will come without any extension. Also, the gil review
was only for the core lib and not for the io extension.
On 4/14/07, Tom Brinkman <reportbase_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >> I'd rather we not call it freetype at all - wrap it up as a generic
> >> text renderer, that just happens to use freetype underneath.
> I'm not shur how the adobe's guys will want to incorporate the extensions.
> This freetype wrapper will be just one of many extensions that will
> be added to GIL.
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk