|
Boost : |
From: Johan Råde (rade_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-17 02:35:21
Here is my review of the Math Toolkit library:
> What is your evaluation of the design?
Intuitive and easy to use.
> What is your evaluation of the implementation?
No opinion.
> What is your evaluation of the documentation?
Excellent.
> What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library?
Extremely useful for those of us who use statistics.
> Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have any problems?
I tried the library with VC++ 7.1. No problems.
> How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study?
I downloaded, compiled and tested the library.
I wrote and tested a piece of code that did some statistical tests with
real data (gene expression data from the plant Arabidopsis Thaliana.)
I may have spent two hours on this.
> Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain?
I'm a mathematician, and I work in bioinformatics,
a field that makes heavy use of statistics.
So I'm qualified to evaluate the statistics part of the library.
I have less experience with special functions,
so this review is only about the statistics part.
> Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library?
Yes, absolutely.
This is an important and very well written library.
I will use it in my future work.
-- Johan Råde
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk