Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-17 14:27:16

Next message: Emil Dotchevski: "Re: [boost] [shared_ptr] dangerous implementation of moveconstructor"
Previous message: Larry Evans: "[boost] [proto]bug in g++4.1?:incomplete type within template(was Re: Preliminary submission: Boost.Proto DSEL Framework"
In reply to: äÍÉÔÒÉÊ ÷ØÀËÏ×: "[boost] Bug in sp_counted_base and atomic_count?"
Next in thread: Дмитрий Вьюков: "Re: [boost] Bug in sp_counted_base and atomic_count?"

Ð”Ð¼Ð¸Ñ‚Ñ€Ð¸Ð¹ Ð’ÑŒÑŽÐºÐ¾Ð² wrote:

> On x86 this is certainly not an issue, but on machines with more
> relaxed memory model (ia64, sparc or power), in my opinion, this can
> be an issue...

If you take a look at the IA64 and PPC versions of sp_counted_base, you'll
see that they do include memory barriers.

Next message: Emil Dotchevski: "Re: [boost] [shared_ptr] dangerous implementation of moveconstructor"
Previous message: Larry Evans: "[boost] [proto]bug in g++4.1?:incomplete type within template(was Re: Preliminary submission: Boost.Proto DSEL Framework"
In reply to: äÍÉÔÒÉÊ ÷ØÀËÏ×: "[boost] Bug in sp_counted_base and atomic_count?"
Next in thread: Дмитрий Вьюков: "Re: [boost] Bug in sp_counted_base and atomic_count?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk