Re: [boost] proto::or_ arity

From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-19 12:08:37

On 04/19/2007 11:46 AM, Eric Niebler wrote:
[snip]
> Oh! You're chaining or_'s together. Sure, that works. So for your 
> initial state, all you need is a pattern that never matches anything. 
> For that, you can use proto::not<proto::_>.

I couldn't get that to compile; however, proto::logical_not<proto::_>
does.  Thanks.