From: Michael Fawcett (michael.fawcett_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-19 13:49:59
On 4/18/07, Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Larry Evans wrote:
> > Hi, Eric.
> > Could you tell me
> > why isn't mpl::vector##N reused instead of proto::arg##N,
> > which, AFAICT, is almost the same?
> Because compile times improved by ~10% when I made the switch.
Were those changes something MPL could use without breaking existing
code? If so, would you see benefit to reusing mpl::vector##N?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk