Boost logo

Boost :

From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-20 13:54:42

Neal Becker wrote:
> We discussed a couple of years back code to do tracebacks that did not
> require instrumenting, which IMO is much more interesting.
> On linux/glibc, there is a function 'backtrace' that can help (libc manual,
> sec 33.1). We did talk about some code. Discussion bogged down on
> demangling symbols. At the time, the demangling code was not free (IIRC),
> but I think that is no longer a problem.

A stacktrace is helpful even without the demangling. In the worst case,
one would have to run c++filt manually, which isn't that bad in a
debugging scenario.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at