Re: [boost] C function adaptor.

From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-20 17:10:14

Steven Watanabe wrote:
> It's not thread safe and the only way I can
> see to make it so is to have a fixed set
> of functions and allocate/deallocate

Why would it need to be thread safe? Usually one puts thread safety 
above this kind of utility layer.

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo