Re: [boost] Any interest for stack_trace?

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-21 16:14:40

"Neal Becker" <ndbecker2_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:f0atqv$t49$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
> We discussed a couple of years back code to do tracebacks that did not
> require instrumenting, which IMO is much more interesting.
>
> On linux/glibc, there is a function 'backtrace' that can help (libc 
> manual,
> sec 33.1).  We did talk about some code.  Discussion bogged down on
> demangling symbols.  At the time, the demangling code was not free (IIRC),
> but I think that is no longer a problem.

I've got the implementation almost ready as part on new portable debugging 
features of execution monitor. It wraps stck walking functionality of 3 
different native interfaces. I am planning to put it into cvs and post an 
anouncement somewhere after BoostCon 2007 and 1.34.0 is out.

Gennadiy