From: Daniel Walker (daniel.j.walker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-27 11:11:09
On 4/27/07, Peter Dimov <pdimov_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On 4/26/07, Peter Dimov <pdimov_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >> I'm fairly certain that we ought to leave Borland users alone,
> >> though.
> > Like I said, I don't think this change will impact borland users,
> > other than making placeholders more interoperable. I'll try to test it
> > later though.
> Interoperability is not an issue for Borland as far as I can see; Lambda
> doesn't work there at all.
Aha, I wasn't aware. Not even borland 6.0? Well, it's reasonable to
leave borland the way it was: it saves effort testing.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk