From: AlisdairM (alisdair.meredith_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-28 05:05:02
Eric Niebler wrote:
> Result_of support for older compilers ... I suppose that requires
> partial template specialization, right? Do we still support compilers
> that don't do PTS?
Trying to port this to Borland/CodeGear I found it depends on SFINAE as
If you try and make sense of the fails I report on the fails I report
on the development compiler, you should see all the fails come from
awkward cases like pointer-to-cv-qualified-member. This is much better
than we can do with the current compiler, where result_of expressions
can't even be parsed (function types between anglew brackets)
Of course, Borland/CodeGear still can't handle proto, so perhaps this
is all accademic?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk