Re: [boost] [Review] The review of the Boost.Guid library startstoday (April 30th)

From: Andy (atompkins_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-30 14:40:40

"Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote in
news:f15b6a$dht$1_at_[hidden]: 

> 
> "Andy" <atompkins_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
> news:Xns99228F292C49atompkinsfastmailfm_at_80.91.229.5...
>> "Henrik Sundberg" <storangen_at_[hidden]> wrote in
>> news:aef9adb00704300822q2459684ex994be6b70700275a_at_[hidden]:
>>
>>> This is not a review, just a remark.
>>>
>>>>From the documentation:
>>> The boost::guid::create() function returns a random-number-based
>>> guid... All functions are thread-safe except boost::guid::create().
>>>
>>
>> Bad working.
> 
> wording?

Sorry.

Bad wording.  From the post I understand that the sentence does not 
convey what I intended.

Andy Tompkins.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost 
>