From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-30 18:57:56
In article <4635C65C.6010707_at_[hidden]> Stefan Seefeld
> Thomas Witt wrote:
>> In article <46352D00.5010301_at_[hidden]> Jeff Garland
>> <jeff_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Thomas, I don't know what you want to do with these, but fwiw, the
>>> 2 date-time
>>> changes look to be trivial and safe. OTOH, they've been there since
>>> at least
>>> 1.33.1 so they're not new.
>> If your comfortable with them feel free to apply.
> May I humbly suggest that, as good / harmless as the suggestions
> maybe, it is *way* too late to have this discussion in the context of
> 1.34 ?
Just in case my remark was ambiguous. I was only referring to the two changes in date_time.
With respect to those my word still stands.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk