From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-01 10:38:58
Jeff Garland wrote:
> Actually, I think Beman's new approach is much closer in philosophy
> to what I'm suggesting. As I recall in provides for a small window
> to fix regressions after which breaking changes will be reverted.
> It's ultimate goal is to keep the HEAD much closer to release at all
> times. Still, it is untested so we don't know how it will really
> work yet.
As I understand it, "keep HEAD release-ready" is the opposite of what you
are suggesting, which is "branch 1.35 as soon as 1.34 is released". In fact,
there is no need to wait for 1.34 to be released - you can have the 1.35
branch proceeding in parallel (general lack of resources aside.)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk