From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-01 11:49:03
Peter Dimov wrote:
> Jeff Garland wrote:
>> The bottleneck I see is the regression testers. Right now Thomas
>> needs them to keep running against 1.34 for final patches he's adding
>> in. Going forward, I believe we will need significant time and energy
>> from the regression runners as we test the subversion switchover.
>> What I'd like to see happen is that instead of going back to main
>> branch after Thomas is done we swap the regression testers over to
>> the 1.35 branch immediately. The folks testing main can be the first
>> beta-testers for subversion switchover.
> The problem with this scheme - from a library developer point of view - is
> that one cannot experiment with new features since nobody is testing HEAD.
> One possible outcome is then for 1.35 to become a de-facto HEAD and absorb
> most of the new development.
It wouldn't be for long b/c the end date of the release would be fixed :-)
And maybe now is the time to try and find a few more regression runners so we
can do more branches at once.
BTW, I don't know if this has been discussed much, but the plan for subversion
switchover, as I understand it, is to take 1.34 as the svn HEAD and force all
work unstable stuff on the CVS HEAD to be brought over using the new process.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk