From: Sohail Somani (s.somani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-02 17:53:57
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Nicola Musatti
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 2:41 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] [1.34.0beta] many, many warnings... :(
> Sohail Somani wrote:
> > It sounds like gcc/msvc are the ones people would be most
> happy with. By
> > turnaround, do you mean them actually running? I don't see why it
> > wouldn't be possible for a subset of configurations.
> Considering the 1.34 regression tests, which only cover officially
> supported platforms, between gcc and msvc there are 16
> variants. You may
> decide to cover only a subset, but you must test all the others to
> ensure you didn't break anything. I wish I could afford to
> run so many
> regression tests each night.
> I still think that a revived bug traking tool, where people who care
> post warning clearing patches, is more viable.
You know what, disregard my other post. I think I'm not being fair.
I'm mixing up "build without warnings" with other stuff but its been
that kind of day.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk