From: Domenico Andreoli (cavokz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-02 18:25:33
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 10:27:58PM -0700, Robert Ramey wrote:
> Jeff Garland wrote:
> > Actually I find it hard to see how it will do any harm either. The
> > class already has a virtual table so it can't increase the size of an
> > instance. The accessibility isn't changed. I guess Robert will need
> > to explain...
this was also my thought...
> I made the suggested change and started to have problems which
> I reported at the time. Now I forget the details. Anyone interested
> could easily re-run the test with the change.
i definitively don't want to find the details the hard way. i just
removed these virtual destructors. thank you.
-----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk