Boost logo

Boost :

From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-04 13:16:29

Vladimir Prus wrote:

> I doubt Boost.Build can be decoupled much more. We have our own mailing list,
> our own issue tracker, our own webpage and our own releases.
> The only coupling is that Boost.Build lives in Boost CVS, and I'm not sure
> if that's bad thing, or good thing.

Technically that may be correct. However, as a matter of fact,
does get developed as part of boost. How long did it take to fix bbv2 bugs
*after* boost was converted to use it ? And how much is the slip of the release
due to problems in the infrastructure, as opposed to actual "C++ library code" ?

As a boost developer I'd rather not worry about infrastructure. At least
not more than absolutely necessary.


      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at