From: Christian Henning (chhenning_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-04 21:48:05
Hi there, here my review.
> Please always state in your review, whether you think the library should be
> accepted as a Boost library!
> - What is your evaluation of the design?
The design is simple and easy to understand. The learning curve is
expectically very low.
> - What is your evaluation of the implementation?
Somebody else on this list was mentioning of a conflicting license
issue with sha1.hpp. This should be resolved before adding this lib to
Same as Dan Nuffer I would like to see a way to change the default
random number generator.
> - What is your evaluation of the documentation?
> - What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library?
I use it for over half a year now and haven't created the a equal guid yet. ;-)
> - Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have any
Yes. I'm using it at work already.
> - How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick
> reading? In-depth study?
I'm using the lib for a while already and I have nothing to complain.
The learning curve really isn't that huge either.
> - Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain?
No. All I need is way to generate ids that are unique.
Thanks for another useful lib.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk