Re: [boost] [review] Boost.Guid

From: Matthias Troyer (troyer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-06 06:30:29

On 5 May 2007, at 06:16, Peter Dimov wrote:
> * I agree that the time(0) seed is unacceptable. A good source of  
> entropy
> probably deserves its own library. It's also not easy to make it
> header-only. One compromise could be for the create function to  
> take an
> Engine argument, but this takes away the simplicity.

How about just adding an additional create function that takes an  
engine?