Boost logo

Boost :

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-07 18:04:44

Opinions? Anybody?


In article <00b101c78ff2$b3d81950$1b884bf0$> "Neil
Groves"<neilgroves_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> This is a multipart message in MIME format.
> ------=_NextPart_000_00B2_01C78FD1.2CC67950
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Hello!
> I am very happy to see that the read_write_mutex has returned to
> boost. I am particularly grateful that there is now scheduling
> configuration too. Thisis very cool.
> In the latest beta version of read_write_mutex I noticed a small
> fault with the bool write_locked() const query in various classes in
> the detail/read_write_mutex.hpp file performing a != instead of an ==
> comparison. I noticed this primarily because I make this mistake all
> thetime!

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at