From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-08 09:48:28
John Maddock wrote:
> I've been working on improving our ability to generate PDF's from
> Quickbook/Docbook source using a "torture-test" consisting of a subset
> of the Math lib docs. I have some questions/feedback required, but
> first some observations:
Thx for doing this. Couple quick comments.
> Improving Our Stylesheets
> I've made some changes (not committed yet) to our fo.xsl stylesheet to:
> * Syntax highlight C++ code.
> * Put a box around code blocks and admonishments.
> * Improve the appearance of tables.
> * Added some keep-together instructions to improve flow-control around
> I've tried to mimic our HTML stylesheets as far possible, and the
> effects can be seen in the test PDF's.
> The Questions:
> 1) How do folks feel about the look and feel of these: are these heading
> in the right direction?
I like the stylesheet so I think you should commit it.
> 2) Do we want a consistent look/feel across all Boost-PDF's? If yes, is
> it OK to commit the stylesheet changes (diff's attached)?
Right now we don't really deliver PDF's in the delivery, although maybe that
will change in the future. I think it clearly needs to be one per library as
we I think we've discussed before. I've been generating one for date-time and
posting it on the web for each release -- I'd certainly adopt your new
stylesheet. In any case, people can customize the stylesheet if they really
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk