From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-08 14:03:40
Peter Dimov wrote:
> Eric Niebler wrote:
>> Looks like this change is causing a linker error on at least one
> So this is the i386 problem (why is this the default for g++ in this day and
> age remains a mystery to me). We can fix it on the atomic_count side by
> supplying an assembly implementation that assumes 486+ regardless of the
> target, as is done with sp_counted_base. Or we can run the SunOS tests for
> i486 or better. Which one should be it?
I'm not familiar with "the i386 problem". Is there an easy way to reuse
the solution for sp_counted_base? Seems to me like we should be
consistent, but it's ultimately your call.
Thanks for looking into this.
-- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk