From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-09 15:03:47
On May 9, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Jeff Garland wrote:
> Having one tree per compiler will seriously break the regression
> test system,
> not to mention making it more resource intense for those that build/
> several compilers on a machine. Not saying it can't be layered on,
> but I
> don't think having 3 trees to run 3 compilers is a good solution.
What's wrong with having 3 *build* trees? We already do that with the
regression test system, except that we call them bin.v2/compiler-1,
bin.v2/compiler-2, and bin.v2/compiler-3 rather than compiler-1,
compiler-2, and compiler-3.
We'll still only have one source tree.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk