From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-10 06:53:05
on Wed May 09 2007, Doug Gregor <dgregor-AT-osl.iu.edu> wrote:
> The only one I'm not sure about is:
> - It should be possible to build multiple variants of multiple
> targets with multiple compilers from a single build command.
> I think this particular requirement is actually a problem itself: it
> only really helps Boost developers that want to quickly test on a
> couple of compilers. The majority of users will typically use Boost
> one just one compiler (especially those users picking up Boost for
> the first time, who are most put-off by a complicated build system).
> It's just as easy, if not easier, to keep separate build trees (one
> per compiler) rather than cram everything into a single build tree.
I've been thinking the same thing myself for some time.
However, for me, the ability to quickly test on a whole mess 'o'
compilers has been crucial to my ability to build portable C++
libraries. So IMO it's still important to cover that use case
somehow. Maybe that ends up being done with scripts?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com Don't Miss BoostCon 2007! ==> http://www.boostcon.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk