|
Boost : |
From: Dave Steffen (dgsteffen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-10 10:34:40
Gennadiy Rozental writes:
>
> "Jorge Lodos" <lodos_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:003f01c7930a$bd3cc160$f9010a0a_at_segurmatica.cu...
> >
> > Hi
> > The code below reports 2 failed assertions of 3. If you comment out one of
> > the BOOST_CHECK macros, it reports 1 failed assertion of 1.
> > Is the extra assertion expected behaviour?
>
> In the version you are using there was an extra assertion for each test case
> that validates that number of failures is not less than expected. Latest
> version is using message to report the condition.
You know, I've seen the same thing, and always figured I was just
confused (a usual state of affairs). :-)
-- Dave Steffen, Ph.D. A Zen master once said to me, "Do the Software Engineer IV opposite of whatever I tell you." Numerica Corporation So I didn't. ph (970) 461-2000 x227 dgsteffen_at_[hidden] -- not Hofstadter (but should have been)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk