Re: [boost] [iterator] Proposal to add is_const_iterator trait

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-15 01:20:12

on Sun May 13 2007, shunsuke <pstade.mb-AT-gmail.com> wrote:

> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>> Hello David,
>> 
>> Sunday, May 13, 2007, 5:21:59 AM, you wrote:
>> 
>>> on Sat May 12 2007, "JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z" <joaquin-AT-tid.es> wrote:
>> 
>>>> I think this is the crux of the matter. value_type is *not*
>>>> the same type as underlying_container::value_type. I think
>>>> Andrey has a valid point here.
>> 
>>> OK, great, then I support the inclusion of this trait.  We just need
>>> tests and docs :)
>> 
>> Here it is in the Vault:
>> 
>> http://tinyurl.com/2z56r2
>
> What does 'is_const' for iterators mean?

Well, good question.  It should be "is_constant_iterator

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com
Don't Miss BoostCon 2007! ==> http://www.boostcon.com