From: Jody Hagins (jody-boost-011304_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-16 10:52:46
On Wed, 16 May 2007 16:25:25 +0200
Marcus Lindblom <macke_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> FWIW, The Xerces C++ API uses the same techinique to version their
> libraries. It also has issues with forward declaration, as that, also,
> needs to be done in the correct namespace.
Right... What type of feedback has there been to this approach among
the Xerces users/developers?
More meaningful, as it pertains to boost, is it something that has been
received warmly, or with disdain? I know nothing about Xerces, so...
how is its size relative to the size of boost, and does this approach
seem to be something viable for boost?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk