Re: [boost] Any libraries now not under the Boost Software License?

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-27 04:37:55

David Abrahams wrote:
>> Based on above research I could tell that only boost::ublas doesn't
>> have BSL, while all the other files are simply a mistake that can be
>> quickly corrected...
>
> In that case I vote for ripping ublas out of Boost unless and until
> the authors fix it.  This is crazy; people have had long enough.

I'm not sure about that: ublas was voted in under it's existing licence, the 
authors didn't know at the time that we were about to change things :-)

Still we should have another go at contacting them whatever,

John.