From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-27 04:37:55
David Abrahams wrote:
>> Based on above research I could tell that only boost::ublas doesn't
>> have BSL, while all the other files are simply a mistake that can be
>> quickly corrected...
> In that case I vote for ripping ublas out of Boost unless and until
> the authors fix it. This is crazy; people have had long enough.
I'm not sure about that: ublas was voted in under it's existing licence, the
authors didn't know at the time that we were about to change things :-)
Still we should have another go at contacting them whatever,
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk