Boost logo

Boost :

From: Andy (atompkins_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-30 10:09:56

"Gottlob Frege" <gottlobfrege_at_[hidden]> wrote in

> On 5/30/07, Oliver.Kowalke_at_[hidden] <Oliver.Kowalke_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> some function definitions are missing the inline keyword (sha1.hpp
>> and uuid.hpp).
>> uuid::is_null() will no be renamed to uuid::is_nil() (ask in order to
>> be conform to UUID-RFC)?
>> Oliver
> Personally, I'd stick to null over nil, as null is more the C++
> standard (ie see the new 'null_ptr' that will probably be added to the
> next standard).

I also perfer null, but I am happy to use what this list decides on.
Maybe both?

> Tony
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at