From: Andy (atompkins_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-30 10:09:56
"Gottlob Frege" <gottlobfrege_at_[hidden]> wrote in
> On 5/30/07, Oliver.Kowalke_at_[hidden] <Oliver.Kowalke_at_[hidden]>
>> some function definitions are missing the inline keyword (sha1.hpp
>> and uuid.hpp).
>> uuid::is_null() will no be renamed to uuid::is_nil() (ask in order to
>> be conform to UUID-RFC)?
> Personally, I'd stick to null over nil, as null is more the C++
> standard (ie see the new 'null_ptr' that will probably be added to the
> next standard).
I also perfer null, but I am happy to use what this list decides on.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk