|
Boost : |
From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-30 16:36:24
Rene Rivera wrote:
> Ping... Any comments on this? It would be nice if people voice some
> comments on this subject now. Instead of later when we would have to
> move a bunch of directories around.
Yes, this looks reasonable to me.
> [boost-svn]
> boost
> stable (full boost tree here)
> devel (full boost tree here)
> branches
> my_branch (full boost tree here)
> cmake_a (full boost tree here)
> cmake_b (full boost tree here)
> tags
> boost_1_33_1 (full boost tree here)
> boost_1_34_0 (full boost tree here)
> sandbox
> devel
> xml (partial boost tree here)
> explore (partial boost tree here)
> branches
> xml_b0 (partial boost tree here)
> explore_b0 (partial boost tree here)
> tags
> xml_for_review (partial boost tree here)
> explore_for_review (partial boost tree here)
I'm still not convinced that the branching in the sandbox
should happen outside the projects (as opposed to let each
sandbox project organize its own substructure), but I don't
have a strong opinion there.
Thanks,
Stefan
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk