Re: [boost] SVN repo structure... [was: Subversion structure in KDE]

From: Aaron W. LaFramboise (aaronrabiddog51_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-31 11:56:28

Henrik Sundberg wrote:
> I think it could be better to have trunk/tags/branches on the topmost
> directory level, and to use trunk instead of devel.

I agree.  See below.

>> [boost-svn]
>>     boost
>>       stable (full boost tree here)
>>       devel (full boost tree here)
>>       branches
>>         my_branch (full boost tree here)
>>         cmake_a (full boost tree here)
>>         cmake_b (full boost tree here)

I think there should be one main devel/trunk, and everything else should 
be in branches, including 'stable'.  Most likely stable is in fact a 
release branch, and so should be under branches.

So:

boost
   trunk
   branches
     release_1_34
     other_branch
     etc