Boost logo

Boost :

From: Manuel Fiorelli (manuel.fiorelli_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-31 18:06:35

I agree with you that boost::noninheritable is probably stronger than
boost::nonderivable (even if the proposed exploit is a very subtle one).
I read boost::noninheritable documentation and I found a typo: indeed, in
the section "When to use", you refer to your library as

Also, I suggest you to:
1) list every known supported compiler, and especially you should compare
it with boost officially supported platforms
2) add to the documentation a section where you explain how to solve the
problem about "value semantics" (copy constructor and assignment operator)

Best regards,
Manuel Fiorelli

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at