Boost logo

Boost :

From: Phil Richards (news_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-04 08:22:00

On 2007-06-03, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
[about Robert Ramey's suggestion]
> I'd like to think about your numbering suggestion above before
> commenting on the specifics. But I do think that if we are going to
> change how we number releases, now might be a good time to do it, and it
> is certainly a good time to talk about version numbering.

And, if there is an intention to change the numbering scheme and
release procedure, it might be the time to move to start with a new
major number (2.x). It would signify a clean break from the past,
and would mean that there wouldn't be some arbitrary "as of version
1.34.1 boost is following the following numbering scheme".

Just a thought...


change name before "@" to "phil" for email

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at