From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-04 13:04:15
"Stefan Seefeld" <seefeld_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>> I don't agree. <major>.<minor>.<patch> scheme has it's virtues.
> I does, but the semantic annotation that comes with these numbers
We are about to make a major change in directory structure/release procedure
(I hope). This is a major change. The rest is "routine" releases. Any
changes that doesn't affect an interface goes into <patch> domain.
> just isn't there in the context of boost. Therefor a single number
> would be more honest.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk